How to SEO Local Video Advertising

Weblistic logo

I recently attended a short webinar from Weblistic, my friend Dick Larkin’s company. Weblistic helps SMEs generate more local leads from a very fragmented Web. They have not revealed too much about their secret sauce but yesterday, they showed how successful they were when search engine optimizing local video ads.

Their first assumption is that search engines are going to integrate video content within their universal search results. Google has already started to do so. Video is also a very fragmented market and opportunities to be found abound. Weblistic is placing bets on all major video sites and has created accounts at most of them. They use the “localvidsdotnet” handle on a variety of social video sites like YouTube, Yahoo Video, Guba, iFilm, and stickam. They then upload their local advertising videos and tag them with a variety of relevant keywords. Videos start appearing in the Google search engine results pages. In this example, Weblistic has managed to capture 7 of the top 10 positions for their merchant name. Cool isn’t it?

What it means: in a fragmented world, there will always be a business opportunity to defragment and simplify. The local video market is a good case study. Weblistic seems to understand that concept and is hoping to simplify Web SEO/SEM for small businesses.


The IM generation (A View From the AlwaysON Media NYC Conference) reports on the insights of the “Keeping the IM Generation’s Mindshare” panel from the AlwaysOn Media NYC conference.

“A crowd of advertisers, marketers, analysts and members of the press packed a ballroom at the midtown Mandarin Oriental Hotel Tuesday to hear a panel of new-media execs talk about how advertisers will have to change their modus operandi to reach young people whose lives are fueled by text messaging,, YouTube and a content-saturated Internet. ”

The Panel:

Highlights and insights:

  1. Verba: “The Internet is “the way they’re going to express themselves, the way they’re going to communicate, the way they’re going to buy things, the way they’re going to share things with their friends, and so on. I think it’s really a generational shift. It’s hard for us to think that way.”
  2. The panel: “Traditional media, from TV stations to advertisers to the print industry, really isn’t in touch with the “IM generation” of tech-savvy teenagers and college students.”
  3. McInerney: “I think the big thing is that you really can’t tell this generation how to use a product. Social-networking pioneer Friendster didn’t allow bands or businesses or different kinds of profiles to be created, and they really kind of forced user behavior, and when they did that, everybody kind of jumped to MySpace. MySpace was successful because it could be used differently by each user.”
  4. Verba: “They’re very, very quick to talk to you and tell you what they like and don’t like. (Piczo’s) users own us. We really don’t own them. They tell us every day what they want and what they don’t like. They’re very vocal…We don’t have to guess.”
  5. Starr: “the IM generation is probably sitting on the biggest access and level playing field that any creative generation’s ever had. However, if the playing field is really that level, it must have room for at least a handful of people over the age of 20.”

The conclusion: “It was apparent that traditional media tactics are going to have to change to meet the demands of the entire Internet, not just its younger users.”

What it means: yet another panel that talks about how we’re seeing a radical change in the way teenagers and young adults consume media. I discussed that topic in November in Web 2.0: Don’t be Caught by Surprise!