Submitted Articles Have a 1.12% Chance of Reaching Digg’s Homepage

Nice additional information to complement my “Digg is an Oligarchy” post from a month ago. Based on data culled from the first Digg Townhall, the folks at CenterNetworks made a quick calculation.

On an average weekday, you have a 150 in 10,000 chance that your submission will hit the frontpage. However we need to remove a piece of your chance because we know that some sites (in Tech for example: Gizmodo, Engadget, NYT, Techcrunch, Lifehacker, Ars Technica) will get more than one a day on average. (…) I peg these special sites at 25% of the daily average which leaves the rest of us with the balance 112 out of 10,000 chance.

CenterNetworks posits that if things don’t improve, the average site or user might not continue to see a benefit in submitting something to Digg.com. Given that there are now two other valuable social news sites out there (Reddit and Mixx), it might be more appropriate to spend energy there instead. They do have a solution for Digg though: “create separate verticals which would allow 150 stories in each category to hit the frontpage of that vertical each day. ” i.e. increase real estate by “verticalizing” the site.

What it means: I totally agrees with CenterNetworks’ proposed solution. I believe the Web is continuing to become more and more vertical and successful “destination” sites that target everything/everyone risk being desintermediated by vertical sites doing a better job than them. We’re seeing the same phenomenon in social networks right now.

4 thoughts on “Submitted Articles Have a 1.12% Chance of Reaching Digg’s Homepage

  1. Stats were around 0,7% and it doesn’t really matter.

    What is really bad now is that there are alot of internal secrecy. Digg bans users and do not explain why, and I’m not saying simply regular accounts, it’s just a flaw in their algo. A lot of people and really deceive by Digg attitude not to really listen to its community😦

  2. Stats were around 0,7% and it doesn’t really matter.

    What is really bad now is that there are alot of internal secrecy. Digg bans users and do not explain why, and I’m not saying simply regular accounts, it’s just a flaw in their algo. A lot of people and really deceive by Digg attitude not to really listen to its community😦

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s